1 October 2013

Paul Dacre and Geoffrey Levy Owe the Miliband Family an Apology!

Last Friday, Geoffrey Levy wrote an 'essay' in the Daily Mail, headed :-

I won't link to the online piece, suffice it to say that it was an overtly vitriolic attempt to smear the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, through his father.

Many people expressed their dislike of Levy's article on social media. Ed Miliband himself was sufficiently upset by this slur on his father to tweet on Saturday:-
Tonight, Ed Miliband's Right of Reply letter was reproduced by Labour Press:

Ed Miliband: My Dad Was A Man Who Loved Britain

Comments from many who are impressed by the dignity of Miliband's letter appeared on Twitter.
 
Then it became abundantly clear that Paul Dacre, in an editorial for Tuesday's Mail, feels neither contrition nor sorrow over Geoffrey Levy's original article:-
 
 

The reaction of journalists and the public, to both right and left politically, has been enormous following the publication of Dacre's editorial and all but a very few have expressed disgust and anger.

Many people are aware that the Daily Mail has form in its support of far right-wing regimes and have tweeted evidence of this:-
There are several other examples of shocking articles like the above.

That Dacre could cheerfully denigrate the father of a political leader, whose beliefs do not match his or the leanings of his paper, also goes a very long way to illustrate the desperation of this editor to bring down Miliband for supporting the press regulation system backed by Lord Justice Leveson. 

Unfortunately for Dacre, his efforts serve only to show precisely why a different, much more ethical form of press regulation is needed....

6 August 2013

Dacre's Daily Mail: 'Not us Guv!'


Today's Daily Mail splash is the latest in the paper's almost daily cynical attempts to deflect attention away from the misdemeanours (including, allegedly, its own) of the press.


However, as the Brown Moses blog's regular contributor reminds us in a beautifully detailed post today:

And:

For further details of the Motorman Files, click the tab at the top of #pressreform homepage. You can also use the 'search bar' to find archived daily reports on the Leveson Inquiry and individuals concerned. Links to written evidence is given on each Leveson Inquiry report.


22 July 2013

Dacre and Desmond cock-a-hoop?

Today the Prime Minister, David Cameron, announced that a strict a new opt-in to Internet porn system is to be installed on every new computer.

Naturally the Daily Mail and Mail Online, long-time campaigners against family-unfriendly porn, wanted to show their appreciation that at last 'Something is to be Done About IT'!

The irony, nay hypocrisy, of Paul Dacre''s triumphant whoops of joy was not lost on most of those who saw the Daily Mail's headline this morning:


 What was it which drew so many loud guffaws? This:-


Is Paul Dacre really welcoming a move to block his daily 'Sidebar of Shame'?

We await a comment from Express' and Star's owner, Richard Desmond, with baited breath..... and a foul-language filter!

Update:


4 July 2013

Sun whistleblower reveals Rupert Murdoch not so humble!

On the 19th of July, 2011, Rupert Murdoch told the Culture Media and Sport Parliamentary Select Committee that that day was 'the most humble day of my life'. Not an altogether convincing performance, but unforgettable all the same:

(Video from ITN)

Tonight, Channel 4 News' Andy Davies, in conjunction with the investigative team at Exaro
revealed:
Earlier this year, in a meeting with a group of Sun journalists (most of whom had been arrested by police for allegedly paying public officials, some of them police officers, for information), Rupert Murdoch had been secretly recorded by one of those present.

The full story can be read on the Channel 4 News website, including a video clip of MP Tom Watson and media commenter Steve Hewlett discussing the revelations with Jon Snow.

What we hear gives the lie to the 'humble' description Rupert Murdoch gave of himself and shows his true attitude towards the police and the misdemeanours of which his journalists have been accused.

Further coverage of tonight's events can be found by clicking the links below:

Guardian
Channel 4 News
Mirror
Financial Times (£)
Telegraph
Evening Standard
ITV News
The Times (£)

As Tom Watson told Jon Snow, it is to be hoped that the audio recording and transcript are immediately passed to the police!

Updated links to media coverage, July 4th:
Roy Greenslade writes:
Extract:
The investigation of News Corp is not, as Murdoch claims, about "paying cops for news tips": it is about systemic corruption. The deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan police at the time, Sue Akers, explained early last year: "The cases we are investigating are not ones involving the odd drink, or meal, to police officers or other public officials. Instead, these are cases in which arrests have been made involving the delivery of regular, frequent and sometimes significant sums of money to small numbers of public officials by journalists."
One of the decisive moments consolidating Murdoch's relationship to the Metropolitan police was the use of police as armed strikebreakers in the 86-87 Wapping dispute. Margaret Thatcher herself had assured Murdoch that the police would be at his disposal, and their collusion in breaking the strike required an operation costing £14m.
As the Guardian journalist Nick Davies pointed out, this was never simply a matter of criminality. It was always about power. The networks of collusion, bribery and complicity that began to be established in the Thatcher era are beginning to be unravelled.

1 July 2013

Look behind you, Mr. Kavanagh!


Isn't that the @GuidoFawkes blog?
This morning's edition of The Sun carries the latest volley in its unremitting personal onslaught against Lord Justice Leveson as well as the ongoing process of negotiation towards a workable system of press regulation.

Trevor Kavanagh's piece follows hot on the heels of one written in a similar vein in the Mail on Sunday this weekend.

Mr. Kavanagh, in a typically hyperbolic and disingenuous tone, begins:
Do these 'close pals' actually exist? Would they really confide in the editor of a paper owned by Rupert Murdoch, the man partly responsible (allegedly) for the need for the Leveson Inquiry in the first place?

The article goes on to repeat several instances (thrice denied by Lord Justice Leveson himself) of perceived impropriety and incompetence which have been used by various newspapers recently to disparage Lord Justice Leveson, his report and the credibility of the Inquiry as a whole. 

But I have a warning for Mr. Kavanagh and the other editors and owners of the press who are trying to manipulate politicians, as well as their readers, into accepting the status quo of press regulation:-

A cartoon by Gerald Scarfe

To continue your panto theme: it was owners, editors and journalists who rubbed the lamp and allowed the genie to escape.

No amount of fruitless, Widow Twankey-like huffing and puffing will stuff it back from whence it came! It's out for good.....


22 April 2013

Mr. Kavanagh's bovvered...again!

 
The Sun today carries the latest in a series of grenades lobbed by its political columnist Trevor Kavanagh.

Kavanagh begins by explaining the apology given by someone on Twitter who had accused the Sun of falsifying a photo taken at the funeral of Margaret Thatcher. Kavanagh then writes:
It reflects an incessantly watchful Twitter world of grievance-seeking vigilantes eager to take offence. But there are signs that it is now seeping into mainstream British culture, especially those with something to hide.
There then follows a short list of examples Mr. Kavanagh uses to illustrate his point, interspersed with such comments as:
At other times these incidents might be shrugged off as amusing examples of human error. But they point to an increasingly suspicious and judgmental atmosphere (#nb - my emphasis) in which people with no axe to grind are encouraged to take offence on other people’s behalf.
The public? 'Suspicious and judgemental'? Surely not! That's the Sun's and Mr. Kavanagh's job! 
Then:
You might think this information was in the public interest. No, they risk prison for misconduct in a public office in two cases and “perverting the course of justice” in one.
This is the Leveson Effect. It has begun to suffocate the crucial flow of information that distinguishes a free country from a police state.
Which came first, Mr. Kavanagh, the questioning, arrest and sometimes charging of News International journalists for 'perverting the course of justice', 'causing misconduct in a public office' or the incidents you itemise? If the police are ultra-strict now about officers' contacts with journalists, who must bear the blame for that?
Britain set an example to the world by establishing a force which polices by consent. By definition, a wall of secrecy removes that consent.
There now follows a petulant Mr. Kavanagh's railing at the fact that the police no longer tip off his journalists when an arrest is made:
It is now common for suspects — innocent and guilty — to be held in absolute secrecy while their personal lives and careers are in limbo indefinitely.
Dozens of decent journalists who have been left to swing in the wind, uncharged for more than a year, know exactly how this feels.
How frustrating that must be! Trial by tabloid denied an unarrested, presumed innocent suspect! Dreadful....
Chief constables have shut down normal channels and begun reacting with hostility to legitimate inquiries.
The ugly assumption is that journalists with impeccable sources must have obtained information by skulduggery. It is the perfect cop-out.
But completely understandable? 
The Press deserves criticism and has taken it by the bucketload. But this sinister new culture of suspicion benefits those with something to hide — not those with the right to know.
Just as, for many years, the silence of editors, journalists and newspaper owners over the phone-hacking scandal benefitted those with something to hide, Mr. Kavanagh?
Lord Justice Leveson barely concealed his contempt for journalists but naively swallowed Hacked Off’s half-truths and exaggerations and accepted evidence from left-wing mischief-maker Full Fact as gospel.
Lord Justice Leveson showed no contempt for most journalists, just coolness towards those few who had been proven to have lied, cheated and shown contempt towards the Inquiry.
Lord Justice Leveson barely concealed his contempt for journalists but naively swallowed Hacked Off’s half-truths and exaggerations and accepted evidence from left-wing mischief-maker Full Fact as gospel.
His adviser throughout was Sir David Bell, intimately linked with the Media Standards Trust which spawned Hacked Off — and the discredited Bureau of Investigative Journalism which smeared Alistair McAlpine.
These oft-repeated accusatory comments against Full Fact, Media Standards Trust and Hacked Off really are wearing thin indeed and need to be left at the bottom of your ammo box, Mr. Kavanagh!
What a shabby basis for new Press laws, stitched up at 2am in a Hacked Off ambush, which is snuffing out Press freedom and the right of the British public to hold authorities to account.
Even an inventive tabloid hack could not make this one up. (#nb - My emphasis)
Oh, I'm sure any of your 'inventive tabloid hacks' could make this one up, Mr Kavanagh.....

Along similar lines is this article from Melanie Phillips in Mail Online:
The Leveson Lovers and a Compromised Inquiry That's Begun a Chilling Assault on Free Speech - Melanie Phillips - Mail Online

10 April 2013

A Death and a Funeral Become Handy Hooks for Mail's prejudices..

When a political leader dies, it's not unusual for the media to feature eulogies, critical examinations of successes or failures and intimate, interesting tales of the life of the figure in question.

Below is a compilation of most of the front pages which appeared on Monday night (with thanks to Nick Sutton at the BBC):

With our mainly right-leaning press, the reporting of Baroness Thatcher's death and impending funeral was never going to be confined to a few dignified articles towards the back of any of our newspapers.

Most have predictably given over front-pages, inside pages and whole pull-out sections to facts and comment with a definite political slant, to be sure, and occasional evidence of a partial rewriting of history, perhaps understandably.

Today's Mirror, (a left-leaning paper), front page questions the cost of Baroness Thatcher's funeral:
But the Daily Mail....

....the Daily Mail has eagerly, nay greedily, seized upon this opportunity to grind what must be the best-honed political axes known in journalistic history!

It has set its attack-troops onto the 'Lefties' and the BBC in equal measure and with real campaigning zeal.

Today's front page cynically depicts one small group of people in demonstrating their disapproval of the former Prime Minister and her policies:
This, with its accompanying article ('penned' by 5 journalists!) is just a sample of the articles which are appearing in the Mail and in Mail Online like bullets out of an automatic rifle.
Another is headed:

Left's chorus of hatred: Champagne in the streets, students union cheers and vile internet taunts

  • Glasgow: More than 300 people attended impromptu street party
  • London: Over 100 people gathered in Brixton to 'celebrate'
  • Facebook campaign to take 'Ding Dong! The Witch is Dead' to number one
  • Durham Miners' Association: Her death was a 'great day' for coal miners
  • Second most trending topic on Twitter: #nostatefuneral
  • NUS National conference reported to have cheered at news of her death
Many of the photographs and articles are designed to point an accusatory finger at those on the left of British politics (or of no particular political persuasion) who, unlike Editor Paul Dacre and the owners of the Mail, do not remember Margaret Thatcher with affection.

Birmingham Council refuses to lower flag to half mast and councillors flounce out of minute's silence as Tony Blair urges Thatcher critics to 'show some respect'

  • Union Jack flag still flies high outside Birmingham's Council House
  • Tories brand Labour leaders 'petty, mean and vindictive'
  • Blair: Urged critics of Thatcherite policies to ‘show some respect’.
The Mail looks forward to the funeral with not a little trepidation (salivation?):

Will the haters try to wreck Maggie's send-off? Police plan massive security operation 'True Blue' for Baroness Thatcher's funeral


One message?
(Full article Here)
As for the oft-battered-by-Dacre BBC, the Mail gleefully shrieks:

Public anger at BBC bias: Viewers hit out at lengthy coverage of poll tax and miners' strike after Baroness Thatcher's death

  • Viewers complain bulletins gave too great an emphasis to critics
  • Twitter users accuse BBC of 'shameless' bias against the former PM
  • One viewer said: 'You name the socialist, they've interviewed them'
  • Another said the coverage was 'an absolute Left-wing biased disgrace'
But as David Cridland, writing for the blog Media UK, points out all is not as it seems in the original Daily Mail article.

Further evidence of the Mail's fabrication of evidence against the BBC's coverage of the death of Margaret Thatcher appears in the Media Blog.

With still a week to go before the funeral takes place, one wonders what heights these paroxysms of outrage and indignation from those at the Mail will eventually reach! Spontaneous combustion, perhaps....

Image from the Naked Scientist website
 

9 April 2013

Speech, dear reader? - What speech?

Today, some of our tabloids' political journalists and bloggers found a speech by Ed Miliband in Ipswich great fun. Nothing wrong with that at all; except that, especially in Tim Shipman's case, the joke included the ridiculing of several young members of the audience.

Tomorrow, there would probably have been a vitriolic article from Mr Shipman attacking the policies announced in the Labour leader's speech today but for the sudden death of Baroness Thatcher earlier.

If we're really lucky, he may combine a eulogy for Baroness Thatcher with a thorough lambasting of Miliband! Either way, his readers will understand no more of Labour's proposals than they did yesterday.... And you thought newspapers were there to inform!

Tim Shipman, Daily Mail:
(Note the inclusion of the link to an image of the three young people he was ridiculing.)

Tim Gatt ITV:

The 'Harry' in that tweet is Harry 'Height of Sartorial Elegance' Cole, @GuidoFawkes blog, The Sun and Spectator.



Update: An article in tomorrow's Mail by Shipman and John Stevens gives a cursory appraisal of Miliband's speech, preferring to accentuate the idea of a split amongst Labour MPs - a theme being pushed by most of the media.

Never mind - Mail readers may never know the details of the opposition leader's speech but will be grateful that Shipman gleaned so much amusement from the physical appearance of a few young people in the audience.

Further update, 9th April: At least someone was listening..!  From Rafael Behr in the New Statesman.

6 April 2013

A Sun Reader's Lament

With abject apologies to the poet John Betjeman, I felt compelled to adapt his poem, 'A Subaltern's Love Song', after reading a tweet from The Sun's political editor yesterday:
  
A Sun Reader's Lament
Mr T. Newton Dunn, Mr T. Newton Dunn,
Furnish'd and burnish'd by R. Murdoch's Sun,
What strenuous efforts you make in a plea
To deny any influence - you with me!

Words dirty, words haughty, oh! weakness of ploy,
To bid us all swallow the murder of joy,
With carefullest carelessness, daily you won,
We are weak from your onslaught, Tom Newton Dunn.

Mr Tom Newton Dunn, Mr Tom Newton Dunn,
How mad I am, sad I am, ashamed that you won,
Despite warm-hearted public, we read in the press,
The 'fury' we feel against those who have less.

The scent of the conifers, sound of the bath,
The view from my bedroom of moss-dappled path,
Struggles with the vision and fine-wrought lie
Of a world observed through Murdoch's Sun's eye.

From the desks of your newsroom there is power to distort,
The reader drawn in by bare breasts and the sport,
While reason lies somnolent, does not question The Sun,
Nor those who dupe wilfully, Mr Tom Newton Dunn. 

~

24 March 2013

'They come over here and nick all our houses!' - Really?


Today's Sunday Express takes a break from gloomy weather portents (for once, right this week!) or contradictory reports on the beneficial/harmful effects of statins to return to an old favourite topic - immigrants.
These headlines presage a speech to be given by David Cameron on Monday when he will reassure the nation that no longer will newcomers to our country be able to jump the social housing queue.

The Mail on Sunday also flags up the PM's speech:

But just how much truth is there in the story that immigrants get preferential treatment by councils when housing is allocated?

From what I can find out, not much - if any!
Mythbuster: Immigration - the Real Story - Red Pepper December 2012

More evidence can be found in the links below, although most are from 2009:
Report - Social Housing Allocation and Immigrant Communities - EHRC - 2009
Queue-jumping Immigrants are a Myth, Says Study - Independent June 2009
Housing 'Not Favouring Migrants' - BBC News July 2009
New Immigrants Occupy Just Two Per Cent of Socila Housing - Report - Evening Standard July 2009

The Express and other tabloids have long been exaggerating the impact of the immigrant population on public services housing, jobs and welfare:
A visit to the Full Fact website and a quick search under 'immigrants' takes you to a far more well-informed source of the truth!

The leaders of all three major political parties are vying with each other to appear tough on immigration. This is partly because of the apparent surge in popularity of UKIP who never flinch in their attacks on the EU or immigration.
An example of UKIP's propaganda:
(Image via Political Scrapbook)












That 29 million is more than the combined populations of both countries!

Are our politicians, in their eagerness to impress potential voters by introducing stricter curbs on the rights (or perceived rights) of people wanting to settle in the UK, not in grave danger of merely fuelling false impressions, encouraging ever greater division and hatred?

There are other voices being raised, however:
From today's Observer
Immigration Fears are Being Stoked by Politicians, Says Bishop - Observer

21 March 2013

Sticks and stones may hurt my bones, but words ..?

I watched every minute of every day of the Leveson Inquiry into the ethics of the press.

I listened to evidence from politicians, journalists - national and regional - editors, owners of papers, union members and leaders, photographers, representatives of the Police service and Justice systems, people from fact-checking internet sites, celebrities and ordinary men and women from all strata of society.

Some of the testimonies I heard made me angry, sceptical or downright suspicious.

Occasionally, I was very impressed by the obvious honesty and integrity many of the participants showed; at times I was utterly repelled by the arrogance, carelessness and refusal of the few to co-operate with the process.

One group of witnesses reduced me to tears.

This group was made up of people who have always been the subject of tabloid (usually, but not exclusively) articles deliberately written in such a sensationalist way as to appeal to the baser emotions of hatred, contempt or revulsion of their readers.

One particular group of people is supported by Trans Media Watch and their website can be found HERE.

The evidence Trans Media Watch gave at the Leveson Inquiry was for me at once upsetting, moving and compelling - but was barely covered by the press or wider media. This is a transcript of the evidence they gave. 
This submission gives details of many of the articles found in the tabloid press and the terrible impact on people involved.

There is a section in the document which describes the response, or lack of response, of the press regulator, the Press Complaints Commission.

Two days ago, a transgender teacher was found dead in her home. She is reported to have taken her own life. Some details have been reported in the New Statesman.

On December 20th last year, Richard Littlejohn got wind of this story and wrote an article about the teacher in the Mail. The article, after the news of the teacher's death broke today, has been altered to remove reference to the teacher by name. Too late.

The reasons for someone taking their own life are always complicated and I in no way suggest that Mr Littlejohn's words encouraged this woman to end hers, indeed there is no certainty at this stage as to how she died - but to have her private life exposed in that way and held up for public comment and disapproval cannot have helped her at an extraordinarily difficult time.

We have this past week witnessed the unedifying spectacle of the battle raging between elements of the UK national press, desperate to retain free rein to print whatever they like, and those who believe that tighter regulation of the behaviour of the papers is needed.

Is the case of Lucy Meadows further evidence that the recently agreed draft Royal Charter is the answer?

The Leveson Inquiry was not set up solely to deal with the outrageous phone-hacking scandal (phone-hacking is illegal anyway) but also to identify why phone-hacking went unreported, uninvestigated for so long. Lord Justice Leveson's remit also covered the ethics of the press and why the Press Complaints Commission seemed so inept at ensuring the privacy, reputation and human rights of individuals Like Lucy Meadows were kept sacrosanct.

The voices of many so regularly brutally used by certain newspapers and 'journalists' like Littlejohn to sell copies still go unheeded.

The Death of Lucy Meadows - Jack of Kent

Samaritans Website

The Sun is incandescent....

Front page of The Sun, post-George Osborne's budget speech, 21st March
Showing its disapproval of the budget speech delivered today by Chancellor George Osborne, The Sun left its readers in no doubt that they would gain cold comfort from the Treasury for the near future!

Do those same readers, however, understand the barbed comment behind the 'Budget Coverage as Approved by the Ministry of Truth' banner? 

Ostensibly, those words mean that The Sun's details are completely accurate, whereas those watching carefully the behaviour of the papers since the apparently unfavourable Commons vote on Monday on regulation of the press, will be aware of a deeper, more vengeful sentiment.

On the 18th of March, The Sun's readers were treated to a very impressive, but startlingly hyperbolic image and quotation from Winston Churchill:-
The overt warning appeared on the very night when the cross-party group of politicians met in a last-ditch attempt to settle on a system of press regulation. It was accompanied by this article. 


Tomorrow, many of the nationals, except for the Daily Express and the Mail, carry very strong front pages too (they can be seen on the left of this #pressreform page) although none have elicited such shock from many Twitter users as that from The Sun:-
It looks as though all MPs will need to watch their backs from now on.....except perhaps Michael Gove and those few Tory MPs who voted against the Royal Charter!

17 March 2013

Whistleblower - new leads for Police

Reports began to surface last night in the media of a surprising development which could make life difficult for Rupert Murdoch and News International, David Cameron in Monday's Commons debate on press regulation and the industry itself.
David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch - image from Guardian
From the Guardian:-
( Full article HERE )

From the Independent:-
( Full article HERE )

This new bombshell landed soon after it became known that, following the arrest and questioning of four serving and former editors at the Sunday Mirror on Friday, a former Daily Mirror Editor, Richard Wallace had been questioned under caution.
From the Guardian:
Richard Wallace and Tina Weaver at Leveson Inquiry - Guardian image
 ( Full article HERE )

Trinity Mirror Asks High Court to Dismiss Alleged Phone-hacking Claims - Guardian
Phone-hacking: First Serving National Newspaper Editor Arrested - Guardian

From the Mail Online:
( Full article HERE )

The Sunday papers will, no doubt, be full of the work of journalists desperate to make their case before the politicians debate and vote for a system of press regulation favourable to them.

Will the papers resort to smears against MPs, hoping to sway their votes?
Will they try to paint Hacked Off as a bunch of underhand, unscrupulous schemers out for revenge?

It will be fascinating to see which strategies they choose in a final push to preserve what they see as 'Press freedom'.....